Sift Partners Network:DwiggerVaro CMSScrape UpEscalopter
UK: Anti-Terrorism Laws used to spy on noisy children
posted by radx 2 months 1 week ago • 162 views
An investigation by The Sunday Telegraph found that three quarters of local authorities have used the Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act (RIPA) 2000 over the past year.

The Act gives councils the right to place residents and businesses under surveillance, trace telephone and email accounts and even send staff on undercover missions.

The Sunday Telegraph

Examples:

  • Newcastle City Council used the Act to monitor noise levels from smoking shelters at two different licensed premises. The council has twice used the legislation to monitor noise from a vet’s practice following a complaint about barking.

  • Blaenau Gwent County Borough Council used it to deal with 16 complaints about barking dogs.

  • Derby Council made sound recordings at a property following a complaint about noisy children.

  • Peterborough Council investigated the operation of the blue badge scheme for disabled drivers.

  • Poole Council used it to detect illegal fishing in Poole Harbour.

  • Basingstoke Council used photographic surveillance against one of its own refuse collectors after allegations he was charging residents for a service that should be free. The operation was dropped when it was decided the allegation was false.

  • Aberdeenshire Council admitted using the Scottish version of the Act to request the name and address of a mobile phone user as part of an investigation into offences under the Weights and Measures Act.

  • Easington council put a resident’s garden under camera surveillance after a complaint from neighbours about noise.

  • Canterbury City Council used CCTV surveillance and an officer’s observations to monitor illegal street trading.

  • Brighton and Hove council launched four operations against graffiti artists

  • Torbay Council accessed an employee’s emails after an allegation that suspect material had been sent. A second employee was investigated over the “use of council vehicle for personal gain”.

  • Westminster City Council covertly filmed a locksmith following allegations of fraud.

  • Durham County Council obtained authorisation to monitor car boot sales during an investigation into the sale of counterfeit goods.


Any truth to these allegations?



bookmarks (0)
Comments subscribe to this feed
probably true. there was quite a bit about such things awhile back. never looked too hard into the specifics when it came up though, so cant comment definitively.


written by Thylan  | 2 months 1 week ago | CH
 0  | flag spam (0)
Yeah it's true. The council borough I live in, used theirs to detect illegal fishing in the harbour I believe but were on the national news for using the law to watch a family who were trying to get their kids into a certain school, to try and prove that they weren't in the right catchment area. It's pathetic and typical, this country is going to shit.


written by alien_concept  | 2 months 1 week ago | CH
 1  | flag spam (0)
Thanks for the info, mate. I was kind of hoping that most or at least some of it was exaggerated, but apparently it's simple reality. Orwell'ian Times, i guess.


written by radx  | 2 months 1 week ago | CH
 0  | flag spam (0)
Exactly!


written by alien_concept  | 2 months 1 week ago | CH
 0  | flag spam (0)
Submit Comment
log in or register to submit new comment


Friends O' the Sift